Emerson Electric Co. · Internal R&D Proposal

Salt, Water, Power

Emerson’s End-to-End Opportunity in Aqueous Stationary Energy Storage: Products, Pilot, and a Billion-Dollar Annual Growth Platform
Submitted to: Emerson Electric R&D Leadership
Submitted by: Material Attendant, Shakopee, MN Operations
Date: April 2026

Confidential · Strategic Exploration
Photo: Petar Miloševi㠷 Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0

Executive Summary

In February 2026, researchers at City University of Hong Kong published a peer-reviewed battery in Nature Communications that achieved 120,000+ charge-discharge cycles using a neutral-pH electrolyte made from magnesium chloride and calcium chloride—commodity mineral salts that cost a fraction of lithium and carry no supply chain risk. The battery is non-flammable, non-toxic, and disposable under standard waste protocols. It is categorically unsuitable for vehicles. But for stationary grid storage—the exact market Emerson’s Ovation Green BESS platform already serves—it could redefine the stationary storage market.

And Emerson already manufactures every tool required to build it. From electrolyte QA to cell assembly to cycle testing to grid management: Rosemount sensors, Micro Motion meters, NI battery cyclers, Afag automation, DeltaV process control, AspenTech digital twins, Zitara battery management, Ovation Green BESS deployment, and Prevalon data center integration. No acquisition is necessary to begin. No competitor—not Siemens, ABB, Schneider, or GE Vernova—spans this full value chain. The only question is whether Emerson recognizes what it already has.

This proposal makes five claims. Each is independently verifiable.

1 · The Science Is Real and Peer-Reviewed

Published in Nature Communications (February 2026). 120,000+ cycles, 2.2V full-cell voltage, non-flammable near-neutral electrolyte (pH 7.0 initial, 4.91–7.02 postcycling). Early-stage (TRL 3–4) with real limitations detailed in this document. The open questions map to instruments Emerson sells.

2 · Emerson Already Makes Every Tool Required

Rosemount 228 conductivity sensors for electrolyte QA. Micro Motion Coriolis meters for electrolyte batching. NI PXI battery cyclers for cell characterization. Afag linear motion for cell assembly. DeltaV for process control. AspenTech for digital twins. Zitara for battery management. Ovation Green BESS for grid deployment. Prevalon for data center integration. No other company (Siemens, ABB, Schneider, GE Vernova) spans this full value chain.

3 · The Electrolyte Is Dirt Cheap and Infinitely Available

MgCl₂ costs ~$300/ton. Lithium carbonate costs $9,000–17,000/ton. A 20–50× cost gap. The electrolyte is FDA food-grade, abundantly sourced, and recoverable from desalination waste brine. No export controls. No supply chain vulnerability. Details in the Supply Chain section.

4 · Emerson Can Pilot This on Its Own Floor

DeltaV prepares the electrolyte. NI characterizes the cells. Ovation Green manages the installation. Zitara monitors health. The full stack, on our own floor.

5 · The Revenue Spans Eight Surfaces — Plantweb Insight Anchors the Recurring Spine

The aqueous battery program opens eight distinct revenue surfaces for Emerson (full table in force-box 7). Battery hardware leads by gross. Brine recovery, hardware-product lift on existing Rosemount / Fisher / DeltaV / NI lines, and a new commodity-recovery line follow. Service contracts on installed fleet compound the base. Plantweb Insight Aqueous — a SaaS subscription module on Emerson’s existing 60M-asset Plantweb platform — is the recurring spine: electrolyte health monitoring, copper-leach early warning, capacity-retention forecasting, predictive cell rotation. The chemistry sells the hardware in Phases 1–3. Plantweb Insight Aqueous sells the next decade at a SaaS multiple, with the deepest customer-switching cost in the stack. At a 2,000-site fleet by year 10 the subscription line alone projects $30M–$100M ARR; at maturity the subscription tops $300M ARR on infrastructure that already exists. The modular skid architecture also enables a land-and-expand commercial pattern: customers commit to a small initial deployment, prove value at low capital risk, and add additional skids onto the same DC bus and Plantweb fleet as appetite grows. The same Plantweb subscription scales with capacity. This is a Plantweb-anchored revenue stack across eight surfaces — not a chemistry pitch with a Plantweb footnote.

6 · The Window Is Open and the Champions Exist

The strategic execution lives on Emerson’s Shakopee floor. Michael Muck, VP Global Operations & Supply Chain for Measurement Solutions, green-lit the prior Shakopee energy R&D pilot (the geothermal heating study) and runs the quarterly all-employee meetings where energy and sustainability strategy is announced on this campus. He has both the operational authority and the demonstrated appetite to sponsor an aqueous-battery Phase 1 at Shakopee, and the macro Twin Cities agency to carry the program upward. Logan Woolery, Senior Manager of Product Management for Emerson’s Industrial Wireless Instrumentation portfolio, owns the upstream sensor-to-Plantweb data path that the SaaS expansion above depends on, and is the operational link into the Plantweb Insight product team. Rodolphe El Khoury, VP North America Operations for Measurement Solutions, runs the Shakopee campus day-to-day and provides the floor-relationship sponsorship up to Muck. Michael Train, SVP & Chief Sustainability Officer (formerly president of Rosemount 2008–2010, the Shakopee business), is the corporate-level sustainability sponsor who can carry the carbon-and-water story upward. The international IP linkage runs through Jennie Li, VP & General Manager of Emerson China (Fortune China’s “25 Most Influential Businesswomen,” Forbes’ “100 Outstanding Women in Business in China” for four consecutive years); COO Ram Krishnan, who previously served as president of Climate Technologies in Asia, based in Hong Kong; and CEO Lal Karsanbhai, who chairs the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and sits on the boards of Merck and the U.S.-China Business Council. Bob Yeager, president of Power & Water, owns the Ovation Green and Zitara battery partnerships. Thurston Cromwell at Emerson Ventures has already invested in battery technology startups. The people, the relationships, and the mandate are already in place.

7 · Aqueous Battery Is the Lowest-Carbon, Inherently Safe Chemistry in the Diesel-Replacement Race

Hyperscale data centers globally consume ~250 TWh/year (IEA estimates ~415 TWh across all data-center categories, growing 12–15%/yr). Each facility installs on-site diesel generators sized to carry the full facility load through grid outages — ~55 GW of diesel backup capacity globally as of 2024, with ~95% of hyperscale operators carrying it (Latitude Media). The gensets run <1% of operational hours but must exist, be permitted, fuel-stocked, and apologized for — the single largest barrier between hyperscalers and their public “100% clean energy” commitments. The diesel-displacement story is a capacity-replacement story, and the category is being booked at scale: Form Energy committed 30 GWh of iron-air at a Google/Xcel Minnesota data center (Feb 2026), 12 GWh more for Crusoe AI data centers (March 2026); CATL launched grid/AI sodium-ion at ESIE 2026 (Mar 31). The market is live; the competition is now about which chemistry wins the second decade once carbon accounting catches up.

Aqueous Mg-ion is structurally positioned for that second decade. Lifetime carbon: 8–30 g CO2-eq per delivered kWh over 30 years — 60–90% lower than LFP Li-ion per ISO 14040/IPCC AR6 LCA, with the floor only achievable by a chemistry that doesn’t consume its electrolyte and doesn’t require fresh iron ore at manufacturing scale or process-water makeup over operational life (the two costs iron-air still carries). 120,000-cycle stability per Chen et al. (Nature Comm 2026), with aqueous Mg-ion ultra-long cycling independently demonstrated at 75,000 cycles by a Beijing Univ. of Chemical Technology / PKU Shenzhen team using a different anode (JACS Feb 2026, zero author overlap with the CityU group). No thermal runaway: aqueous MgCl2 electrolyte cannot burn, eliminating fire-suppression overhead and the ~30% bunker-wall building footprint that LFP and Li-ion stationary still impose. Negative water footprint at scale when paired with desalination-brine MgCl2 sourcing (~142M m3/day of MgCl2-rich desalination brine dumped globally (UNU-INWEH 2019)) — the first stationary chemistry that can credibly make that claim. Zero new mineral extraction at scale (Cu cathode in-process recycled via electrowinning).

Iron-air will win the 2025–2030 deployment race — Form Energy delivered its first commercial pilot in late 2025 (1.5 MW / 150 MWh at Great River Energy, Cambridge MN, ~50 minutes from Shakopee), their Weirton WV factory has launched production, and their >75 GWh order book under contract is real and deserved. Aqueous Mg-ion is positioned to win the 2028–2040 second wave, when the hyperscaler ESG question moves from “cleaner than diesel” to “how clean per delivered kWh over 30 years.” Only Emerson can pair this chemistry with the Plantweb monitoring moat that no other stationary-storage manufacturer has — turning each deployment into a SaaS surface that compounds. Chemistry + cells + racks + Plantweb + the deepest carbon and water story in the category. The diesel-replacement category opens once. The chemistry that owns its second decade is the one with the lowest carbon per delivered kWh, the cleanest water trail, and the deepest instrumentation. That chemistry is aqueous Mg-ion. The company structurally positioned to ship it is Emerson.

8 · The Financial Outlook — $485M Conservative · $1.7B Median · $4.2B Ceiling

A year-10 mature outlook across all eight revenue surfaces. Stage 0 cost is $200K–$400K. Stage 1 cost is $1.0M–$1.8M. The median outcome is $1.7B annual revenue. The ROI on Stage 1 capital, on the median case, is four orders of magnitude.

Revenue surface Conservative Median Ambitious
Battery hardware sales (1–10 GWh/yr at scale)$300M$1.0B$2.5B
Brine recovery (new product line, 16K desal plants)$50M$200M$500M
Existing-product lift (sensors, valves, control)$50M$200M$500M
Service & maintenance contracts (5–10% of CAPEX)$50M$150M$250M
Plantweb Insight Aqueous SaaS (recurring spine)$20M$80M$300M
Copper recovery (downstream service)$5M$15M$30M
Carbon credits / sustainability premium$5M$25M$50M
CityU IP outbound licensing$5M$20M$80M
Total annual revenue, year 10 mature $485M $1.7B $4.2B

Plantweb Insight Aqueous ranks #1 by quality (5–10x SaaS multiple, deepest switching cost) and #5 by gross; battery hardware leads gross by 4–10x. The ambitious case requires hyperscaler water-stress regulation landing in years 4–6 and Plantweb Aqueous becoming a cross-vertical SaaS spine. The conservative case requires only that the Phase 1 chemistry validates and we build the first commercial unit on schedule. Either case justifies the Stage 1 ask by orders of magnitude.

Rosemount pressure transmitters
Rosemount pressure transmitters on the Shakopee production floor. Precision measurement is the core competency—built by these hands, calibrated to these standards. A battery pilot is a new application for muscle memory. Photo: Emerson / Shakopee
Salt. Water. Iron. Copper.
The four most abundant industrial materials on Earth.

Why This Comes from Shakopee

This proposal originates from the production floor at Emerson’s Shakopee facility, 500,000 square feet of manufacturing and R&D that serves as the global headquarters for Rosemount measurement technologies. The campus is run by Rodolphe El Khoury, VP of North America Operations for Measurement Solutions. El Khoury spent thirteen years rising through Emerson’s global operations: purchasing and materials management, plant management, then Operations Director overseeing manufacturing across Dubai, Romania, Kazakhstan, and Saudi Arabia. He holds a specialized Master’s in Supply Chain Management from HEC Paris and five certifications spanning supply chain, project management, and strategy. His appointment to lead North America operations from Shakopee brought to the Midwest a leader whose career arc maps to the same geographies this proposal covers: the Middle Eastern desalination corridors, the European engineering hubs like Cluj, and now the American manufacturing heartland.

I work on that same floor, handling the lithium-ion batteries Emerson ships daily. That vantage point (seeing the hazmat protocols, the thermal management requirements, the disposal costs) made one thing clear: lithium-ion is optimized for vehicles, and it excels at that. But stationary storage doesn’t need energy density. It needs cycle life, safety, and low cost. The chemistry optimized for a car is not the same chemistry optimized for a building.

Emerson Shakopee hazmat staging area
Lithium-ion batteries staged for shipment on Emerson’s Shakopee manufacturing floor. Every box carries UN3090 hazmat classification, “CARGO AIRCRAFT ONLY” transport restrictions, and “FORBIDDEN FOR TRANSPORT ABOARD PASSENGER AIRCRAFT” labeling. This is the cost of lithium: not just the chemistry, but the logistics. Aqueous batteries ship as non-hazardous goods. Photo: Connor Scanlan, Emerson Shakopee
Why I’m Writing This

I am a Material Attendant. I move boxes that say UN3090 across a floor most people in this company will never walk. Every day I see what lithium really costs Emerson — not the $/kWh on a procurement sheet, but the hazmat protocols, the cargo-aircraft-only labels, the disposal lines, the careful language we use when a customer asks how the cells get to them.

I read the Chen paper because I read papers. I built this proposal on nights and weekends because the more I read, the more obvious it became that Emerson — this Emerson, the one I work for in Shakopee — already owns the catalog the next chemistry needs.

I am not a chemist. I am not credentialed. I am writing because nobody else in my line of sight was going to. If the math is wrong, please show me. If the math is right, please move.

— Connor Scanlan · Material Attendant, Shakopee
A Note on “Salt”

This battery does not use table salt. The word “salt” in chemistry refers to any compound formed when an acid reacts with a base. There are thousands of salts. Three matter here:

Na⁺
Cl⁻
1 : 1 RATIO
NaCl
Sodium Chloride
Table salt · Kosher salt
Sea salt · Pink Himalayan

Na⁺ carries +1 charge
One electron per ion

Not used in this battery.
Cl⁻
Mg²⁺
Cl⁻
1 : 2 RATIO
MgCl₂
Magnesium Chloride
Road deicer · Tofu coagulant
Dust suppressant · FDA GRAS

Mg²⁺ carries +2 charge
Two electrons per ion

Primary electrolyte.
Cl⁻
Ca²⁺
Cl⁻
1 : 2 RATIO
CaCl₂
Calcium Chloride
Road deicer · Food preservative
Desiccant · Concrete accelerant

Ca²⁺ carries +2 charge
Two electrons per ion

Secondary electrolyte.
Why Divalent Ions Matter

Every time an ion crosses the electrolyte, it carries charge. A sodium ion (Na⁺) carries one unit of charge. A magnesium ion (Mg²⁺) or calcium ion (Ca²⁺) carries two. Same trip, twice the payload. This is why divalent electrolytes can deliver higher energy transfer per ion shuttle—a fundamental advantage for grid-scale storage where cost per cycle matters more than weight.

MgCl₂ and CaCl₂ are both FDA GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe). When this document says “salt,” it means these mineral chlorides, not the sodium chloride on your dinner table.

Electrolyte Cost Comparison
MgCl₂ (this battery) ~$300/ton
CaCl₂ (this battery) ~$344/ton
Lithium Carbonate (Li-ion) ~$9,000–17,000/ton

Lithium carbonate is mined from finite deposits, subject to export controls, and has swung from $6,000 to $80,000/ton in a single price cycle. MgCl₂ and CaCl₂ are commodity chemicals with decades of stable pricing, abundant supply, and no geopolitical concentration risk. The cost gap is 20–50×. Every winter, the same salt covers our campus sidewalks.

Why the Timing Is Now

The data center crisis. U.S. data centers consumed 183 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2024, more than 4% of the country’s total. Demand is projected to reach 75.8 GW this year and 134.4 GW by 2030. Microsoft has disclosed an $80 billion backlog of Azure orders it cannot fulfill because the power isn’t there. Communities are revolting: in Ohio, a constitutional ballot initiative to ban data centers exceeding 25 megawatts would require 413,488 signatures to reach the ballot. The Ohio EPA is considering general permits to let data centers discharge heated wastewater into local streams. Town halls are packed with citizens furious about rising electricity bills, depleted aquifers, and contaminated water.

Lithium is the wrong answer at scale. In September 2025, a lithium battery exploded at a South Korean data center and shut down 647 government digital services. The batteries had been installed in 2012–2013, barely past their rated lifespan. In January 2025, the world’s largest grid-storage fire at Moss Landing, California evacuated 1,200 residents and burned for days. In response, Monterey County is advancing a moratorium on new battery energy storage systems. Lithium-ion is flammable, toxic, and on a 5–10 year replacement cycle. And it is the technology the industry is deploying for stationary storage. Emerson’s Prevalon data center partnerships and Ovation Green BESS management software are already positioned in this market. What the market needs is a battery that doesn’t catch fire, doesn’t poison the water, and doesn’t require replacement every decade.

STATED MINIMUM GOAL

Emerson becomes the first American automation company to build dedicated capability for aqueous battery chemistries, establishing the integration, instrumentation, and controls standard for a domestically-sourced, next-generation stationary energy storage technology. If the electrolyte permanence hypothesis holds, this becomes a battery that is never consumed and never replaced. Sustainable sourcing from day one.

Act I

The Science

The chemistry. The instruments. The proof.
Lithium-ion coin cells in test fixture
Lithium-ion coin cells in test fixture — Chingo K · Wikimedia Commons CC BY 4.0
Act I · The Science

What Lithium Proved. What Brine Must.

This section separates peer-reviewed findings from open questions.

Peer-Reviewed Findings

The February 2026 paper in Nature Communications (Chen et al.) describes covalent organic polymer anodes paired with Prussian blue analogue cathodes in a neutral-pH electrolyte of MgCl₂ or CaCl₂. Results:

120K+
Charge Cycles
(at 20 A/g)
Li-ion: 3,000–5,000
2.2V
Full-Cell
Voltage
Highest for aqueous
48.3
Wh/kg
Electrode-Level
Low — stationary only
pH 7.0
Near-Neutral
Electrolyte
Non-flammable, no thermal runaway

Non-flammable. Standard waste disposal (GB 18599-2020). Research team across City University of Hong Kong, Yanan University, Southern University of Science and Technology, and Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory.

Honest Limitations

What Any Electrochemist Will Ask

Energy density is low. ~20–30 Wh/kg at cell level. One-fifth to one-eighth of LFP. Categorically unsuitable for vehicles. Value is exclusively in stationary storage where weight is irrelevant and cycle life is everything.

Cycle life was measured at extreme current density. 120,000 cycles at 20 A/g. Performance at grid-relevant C-rates (C/4 to C/2) is uncharacterized. This is the exact question Emerson’s NI division can answer.

Scale-up is unproven. Covalent organic polymers require multi-step condensation reactions. Precursor costs at scale and material property retention during bulk manufacturing are open questions. Highest technical risk.

Core chemistry was published by a Hong Kong research group. Patent claims may cover specific implementations, but the foundational science is public and the material classes have extensive prior art. Partnership is the preferred path; independent development is viable. Early outreach is essential. See The Intellectual Property Question for full analysis.

2.2V exceeds water’s stability window (~1.23V). Gas evolution suppression is a known engineering challenge affecting safety and efficiency.

Temperature sensitivity. MgCl₂/CaCl₂ conductivity drops at 0–10°C. Relevant for outdoor installations.

Commercialization timeline is uncertain. Traditional battery commercialization takes 10–15 years from lab to market. AI-accelerated materials science and China’s track record of compressing lab-to-factory timelines (LFP went from academic paper to global dominance in under a decade) may shorten the window, but no one can predict by how much.

Technology Comparison

CharacteristicAqueous Brine BatteryLithium-Ion (LFP Grid)
Charge cycles120,000+ (lab, high rate)6,000–10,000 (commercial)
Energy density48.3 electrode (~20–30 cell)90–120 Wh/kg cell-level
Electrolyte safetyNon-toxic, near-neutral pH, food-gradeFlammable organic solvents
Fire riskWater-basedThermal runaway possible
DisposalStandard wasteHazardous waste protocols
Best applicationStationary grid / long-durationPortable / automotive
MaturityTRL 3–4TRL 9
Electrolyte costCommodity mineral saltsLithium/cobalt supply chains
What 120,000 Cycles Means in Practice
329
years at 1 cycle per day
AQUEOUS SALT BATTERY — one installation, zero replacements
2026 — 2355
33×
replacements over the same period
LITHIUM-ION (LFP) — replace every 8–10 years
2026
2126
2226
2355
Cycle life measured at 20 A/g. Performance at grid-relevant C-rates (C/4 to C/2) is the central question Phase 1 answers. Even at 10% of published cycle life, the battery outlasts lithium by 3×.

How the Chemistry Works, and What Emerson Measures at Every Step

The open scientific questions about this chemistry correspond to Emerson instruments. The mapping below is step by step.

✻ THE PERPETUAL ELECTROLYTE

In a lithium-ion battery, the organic electrolyte degrades. Solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers grow on lithium-ion anodes. Capacity fades. After 6,000–10,000 cycles, the battery is hazardous waste requiring thermal management during dismantling, regulated transport, and expensive recycling.

In the aqueous battery, the electrolyte is not consumed as a reactant. MgCl₂ dissolved in water carries Mg²⁺ ions between electrodes; the salt itself does not participate in the electrochemical reaction. The paper confirms that postcycling pH remains in the range 4.91–7.02 and no heavy metals are introduced. What the paper proves, and what remains to be confirmed:

Proven — Chen et al., Nature Communications 2026

Safe for direct environmental discard — non-toxic, compliant with GB 18599, ISO 14001, and RCRA

Electrolyte pH stable after cycling — the salt water remains near-neutral

No hazardous byproducts — postcycling ICP shows only Mg, Ca, Cl, and trace Cu from the cathode

Phase 1 Must Confirm

Reuse in a replacement battery — can the cycled electrolyte perform in a fresh cell?

Copper accumulation from the CuFe-PBA cathode — how much Cu leaches per cycle, and does it affect performance or require remediation?

Long-term stability at grid-relevant C-rates (C/4 to C/2), not just the 20 A/g used in the paper

Optimal grid-scale concentration — 4.0M (handling-optimized) versus saturated 5.8M (paper-replication) tested head-to-head as a Phase 1 deliverable. The answer becomes the field reference.

The permanence hypothesis. If the electrolyte survives scale-up as the lab data suggests, this becomes infrastructure. Like copper wire. Like concrete. Like the telephone line. Not gasoline. The sourcing footprint becomes a one-time cost, not an ongoing extraction treadmill. That is the question Phase 1 is designed to answer.

A note on the 2.2V operating window: At high voltage, trace amounts of H₂ and O₂ gas can evolve from the aqueous electrolyte. This is fundamentally different from lithium-ion thermal runaway, which involves organic solvent combustion at 800°C+. The aqueous gases are non-flammable in the concentrations produced, manageable with standard catalytic recombiners (already used in lead-acid VRLA systems), and the “water-in-salt” concentration regime further suppresses their formation. The claim is not “zero gas.” It is “non-flammable electrolyte, non-catastrophic failure mode, no thermal runaway.” This is the safety distinction that matters for data centers and indoor installations.
◆ The Copper Question — and the Emerson Answer

The CuFe-PBA cathode releases trace copper into the electrolyte during cycling. This is a known degradation mechanism in Prussian blue analogue cathodes, and it opens a measurement and remediation opportunity that maps directly to Emerson’s existing capabilities.

Detection — Emerson Already Sells This

Rosemount 228 toroidal conductivity sensor — monitors electrolyte concentration changes in real time

Rosemount 3900/396 pH/ORP sensors — tracks the 4.91–7.02 pH drift that signals cathode degradation

NI electrochemical impedance spectroscopy — characterizes ion transport changes as Cu accumulates

Together: a closed-loop monitoring system that tells you when the electrolyte needs remediation, not replacement.

Remediation — Partner or Acquire

Trace copper removal from chloride brines is a solved problem in hydrometallurgy:

Electrowinning recovers >90% of dissolved copper from MgCl₂ solutions. emew (vortex electrowinning, modular, recovers metals to <5 ppm) and ElectraMet (Lexington, KY; electrochemical recovery, chemical-free, serves semiconductor/EV/mining) have production-ready technology.

Saltworks Technologies (Richmond, BC, Canada) — advanced ion exchange and selective electrodialysis for trace metal recovery from chloride brines. Production-deployed at mining and industrial sites. Modular systems complement Emerson’s process automation stack.

Ion exchange resins selectively capture Cu²⁺ from mixed-salt solutions

• At ~$13–14/kg copper (2026 LME, June), recovered copper has resale value, turning a maintenance step into a revenue stream

Native copper crystal — macro close-up
Native copper crystal · Steven Lek · Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0
This is what the recovered copper looks like. Electrowinning from dilute chloride solution produces dendritic powder: tree-like crystalline particles, reddish-pink, warm copper-gold. Metallic snowflakes. Each grain branches like frost on glass. Pure enough to resell at ~$13–14/kg on the London Metal Exchange (June 2026 cash). A waste stream that pays you back in metallic dust.
The play: Emerson instruments detect the contamination. A partner or acquired technology remediates it. The electrolyte goes back into the battery. This is the “permanent infrastructure” thesis. Not assumed, but engineered.

The Cell Architecture

Cell Stack · CR2032 Format
Phase 1 test cell · 20 mm × 3.2 mm · 2.2 V
BOTTOM CASE (cathode side) Ti FOIL (25 µm) CuFe-PBA CATHODE 70:20:10 AM:CB:PVDF · 50-80 µm ~80 µL electrolyte GF/A SEPARATOR Whatman · 260 µm · 16 mm ø ~80 µL electrolyte COP ANODE 70:20:10 AM:CB:PVDF · N/P 1.1-1.2 SS 316L (25 µm) SPACER (0.5 mm) WAVE SPRING TOP CAP + GASKET CR2032 · 20 mm ø × 3.2 mm 2.2 V
Expected Voltage Profile
C/10 formation cycle · what good looks like
2.2 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.2 Voltage (V) Capacity (mAh/g) 0 25 50 Charge Discharge Voltage hysteresis (should be <200 mV)
Charge sweeps from 0.2 V to 2.2 V at C/10. Discharge returns the capacity. The gap between them — the hysteresis — is the loss budget. Under 200 mV means a healthy cell. Phase 1 measures this against the paper.

Anode: Covalent Organic Polymer (COP). Stores charge through reversible radical cation formation—the polymer backbone accepts and releases electrons with minimal structural deformation. No intercalation-driven expansion/contraction cycle. This is why the cycle count reaches 120,000: the primary degradation mechanism that limits intercalation-based batteries does not apply here. The tradeoff is energy density (fewer electrons per gram), which is irrelevant for stationary storage.

Cathode: Prussian Blue Analogue (PBA). An open-framework crystal structure that allows Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ ions to intercalate with minimal lattice strain. PBAs are synthesizable from commodity iron-based precursors at room temperature. No exotic materials, no conflict minerals, no constrained supply chains. The open framework accommodates the larger divalent ions without the structural stress that limits monovalent lithium intercalation cathodes.

HOW THE AQUEOUS BATTERY WORKS
Cell Architecture: COP Anode  |  MgCl₂ Electrolyte  |  PBA Cathode
ANODE
Covalent Organic Polymer
(Hex-TADD-COP)
Stores charge via
reversible radical
cation formation

Minimal volume change
→ Primary degradation
pathway eliminated
→ 120,000+ cycles

No intercalation
No cracking
Mg²⁺
ELECTROLYTE
MgCl₂ / CaCl₂
pH 6.5–7.5
4.0M & sat. 5.8M tested
“Water-in-Salt” regime:
At high concentrations,
free water coordinates
to salt ions, suppressing
H₂O splitting

Stability window
expands past 2.2V

Same salt family as
ocean, tofu, road de-icer
Mg²⁺
CATHODE
Prussian Blue
Analogue (PBA)
Open-framework
crystal structure

Accommodates
Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ ions
with minimal
lattice strain

Iron-based precursors
Room temperature
No conflict minerals
←  2.2V Full-Cell Voltage  →

Electrolyte: Concentrated MgCl₂ or CaCl₂ at pH 7.0. The water-in-salt regime described above is what makes this possible. Verifying that the suppression holds at scale, across temperature ranges, and over thousands of hours at grid-relevant current densities is the core question Phase 1 is designed to resolve.

Why This Matters for Emerson

The parameters above (electrolyte concentration, pH stability, electrode coating uniformity, gas evolution, impedance, cycling behavior) are all measurements. And every measurement maps to an Emerson instrument. Every open question maps to one too.

The Instrument Map: Science Question → Emerson Product → Answer

Science Question → Emerson Product → Answer
10 instruments · 10 questions · 1 company
Stage 1 · Electrolyte Preparation & QA
Electrolyte ionic conductivity
MgCl₂ concentration must be precise to maintain the water-in-salt stability window. Too dilute: water splits at 1.23V. Too concentrated: viscosity kills ion transport.
Rosemount 228
Toroidal Conductivity
Up to 2,000,000 µS/cm
Electrolyte density & mass flow
Batch-to-batch consistency determines cell-to-cell uniformity across a production line.
Micro Motion ELITE
Coriolis · Mass flow, density,
temperature in one instrument
Electrolyte pH
Must remain at 7.0. Any drift indicates parasitic side reactions or electrolyte decomposition.
Rosemount 372/RBI
pH Sensors · Extended-life
harsh electrolyte environments
Stage 2 · Cell Manufacturing
Electrode slurry viscosity
COP anode applied as slurry. Viscosity determines coating thickness uniformity, directly affecting capacity and cycle life.
Micro Motion Fork
Viscosity Meter · Real-time
inline during manufacturing
Gas evolution (H₂/O₂)
At 2.2V, the water-in-salt suppression must be verified at scale. Gas evolution means efficiency loss and potential safety concern.
Rosemount 928
Wireless Gas Monitor · O₂
+ 628-H₂ module (concept)
Process control & digital twin
Electrolyte preparation, cell formation cycling, and quality gates require real-time closed-loop control with safety interlocks.
DeltaV + AspenTech
DCS + HYSYS Digital Twin
Industry standard · Deployed
Stage 3 · Testing & Characterization   ★ Critical Stage
Electrochemical impedance (EIS)
Charge transfer resistance reveals degradation onset and ion transport bottlenecks, long before capacity loss is visible.
NI PXI
EIS Platform · mHz to MHz
frequency-domain spectroscopy
C-rate cycling performance  THE OPEN QUESTION
The headline cycle count was measured at 20 A/g (extreme rate). Grid storage operates at C/4 to C/2. Nobody has published this data. The first lab to produce it sets the benchmark.
NI HPS-17000
Battery Cycler · 150 kW
CC-CV/CP/CR/fast pulse
Automated protocol sequencing
Stage 4 · Grid Deployment
State of charge / State of health
Aqueous cells have different voltage curves, impedance signatures, and degradation modes. BMS algorithms must be recalibrated from scratch.
Zitara BMS
Cell-level SoC/SoH · Predictive
analytics · Integrated Ovation Green
Ten instruments. Ten open questions. One company makes them all.
Phase 1 protocol adds GITT, high-precision coulometry, Raman spectroscopy, EQCM, and water activity validation — see companion document.
Beyond the Map: The Instrument Map as Product Roadmap

Each row above is a current product — and a platform for a specialized aqueous variant that creates new revenue and customer lock-in:

• The Rosemount 628’s modular sensor cartridges could add a dedicated H₂ concentration module, serving not just aqueous batteries but hydrogen electrolysis plants, fuel cell facilities, and sealed BESS installations. A market currently owned by Dräger and Honeywell Analytics, where Emerson does not compete today.

• The Rosemount 228 becomes an aqueous electrolyte QA reference standard. The HPS-17000 becomes a pre-configured aqueous cell test protocol. Zitara becomes an aqueous-specific degradation model. Each specialization deepens the competitive advantage.

• And critically: integrated into DeltaV, these sensors enable closed-loop safety and process control: gas detection triggers automated response, not just an alarm. No standalone detector from a competitor can do this. The integration layer is the advantage no standalone sensor vendor can match.

The Emerson Product Stack: Four Stages, One Company

The Instrument Map above connects the science to the catalog. Below, the same products are organized by where they sit in the value chain, from raw electrolyte to operating grid asset. Each stage bar matches the color coding in the table.

Rosemount 228
ROSEMOUNT
228 Conductivity
Micro Motion ELITE
MICRO MOTION
ELITE Coriolis
Ovation Green BESS
OVATION GREEN
BESS Management
Stage 1 · Electrolyte Preparation & QA

Rosemount 228 conductivity · Rosemount 372 pH · Micro Motion ELITE Coriolis · DeltaV process control · AspenTech HYSYS digital twin. The same sensors marketed for Li-ion electrolyte QA. MgCl₂/CaCl₂ is less corrosive than the LiPF₆ they currently handle. Emerson already published an application note for Li-ion electrolyte quality. Aqueous is an easier application.

Stage 2 · Cell Manufacturing

Micro Motion Fork viscosity for electrode slurries · Afag electric linear motion (acquired 2023 for battery manufacturing) · Rosemount 928 gas evolution safety monitoring · Fisher/ASCO precision electrolyte dispensing. The COP anode is applied as a slurry, exactly the viscosity application Micro Motion was built for. Afag handles precision cell assembly. The 2.2V operating voltage means gas evolution monitoring is critical.

Stage 3 · Cell Testing & Characterization

NI PXI impedance spectroscopy · NI HPS-17000 battery cycler (150 kW) · EECOMOBILITY AI-driven test software. This is the stage that answers the central question: how does the aqueous chemistry perform at grid-relevant C-rates? This data does not exist yet. Whoever publishes it first sets the standard.

The NI Advantage (photographed below)

NI PXI Battery Cell Test Platform. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), AC/DC internal resistance, open-circuit voltage, and full cycling with the HPS-17000 battery cycler (up to 150 kW, CC-CV, CP, CR, fast pulse). This is the instrument that answers the question potential customers will ask first: what happens at grid-relevant C-rates? Emerson doesn’t just deploy batteries. It makes the instruments that prove whether they work.

NI also invested in EECOMOBILITY through Emerson Ventures, AI-driven battery testing software. The test-and-characterization stack is already being assembled.

NI/Emerson Battery Test System
NI NHR-9300 Series Battery Test System — high-power module and pack validation for cycling, EIS, and impedance analysis at scale. When aqueous cells move from lab to production (Phase 2–3), this is the system that validates them. Emerson owns the test instrument for each stage: the HPS-17000 for cell-level cycling, the NHR-9300 for pack-level proof. Deployed in lithium-ion labs worldwide. Repurposing it for aqueous electrolytes is a configuration change, not an R&D project. Photo: NI / Emerson
Stage 4 · Grid Deployment & Management

Ovation Green BESS (chemistry-agnostic, deployed commercially) · Zitara BMS (integrated into Ovation Feb 2025, cell-level SoC/SoH) · Prevalon Energy data center BESS partnership (announced 2025) · Liebert existing hyperscale customer relationships. The control layer for any stationary battery is installed. When aqueous cells reach deployment scale, Ovation Green is the control layer.

Grid-scale battery energy storage system (BESS) — the market Emerson serves. Emerson’s Ovation Green platform manages BESS installations regardless of cell chemistry. When aqueous cells reach deployment scale, Ovation Green is the control layer. The infrastructure is not hypothetical. It is installed and commercial. Photo: Reid Gardner BESS, Moapa, Nevada · Wikimedia Commons CC0
No Other Company Can Say This

The instrument map and product stack above tell the same story from different angles: Emerson covers all four stages of the aqueous battery value chain. Siemens has no NI. ABB has no Afag. Schneider has no Rosemount. GE Vernova has no Zitara. The coverage matrix below shows why.

Act II

The Opportunity

The products. The customers. The supply.
Photo: James Grellier · Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 3.0
The Products

New Products Emerson Could Build

The instruments are installed.
The feedstock is flowing.
Every product below builds on existing capabilities.

None requires acquiring new technology. Each generates revenue regardless of which specific aqueous chemistry wins.

Product Concepts · Derived from the Instrument Map
Concept New Module
H₂
HOT-SWAP CARTRIDGE
Rosemount 628-H₂
Hydrogen concentration sensor module for the 628 Universal Gas Sensor platform. Catalytic sensing element, 0–4% LEL range. Hot-swappable into existing 928 Wireless Gas Monitors.
Markets: H₂ electrolysis · Fuel cells · Sealed BESS · Lead-acid rooms
Parent: Rosemount 628/928 platform
Competitors displaced: Dräger · Honeywell Analytics · MSA
Concept Integration
σ
228
pH
372
ρ
ELITE
DeltaV
Aqueous Electrolyte QA Station
Pre-integrated QA package: Rosemount 228 conductivity + 372 pH + Micro Motion ELITE density, feeding a DeltaV-controlled quality gate. Turnkey certification for every electrolyte batch.
Markets: Aqueous battery manufacturers worldwide
Parent: Product 1 (Electrolyte Prep Skid) — QA subsystem
Advantage: Certification standard → industry lock-in
Concept Software
C/4 → C/2 → 1C → 2C
HPS-17000-AQ Protocol Suite
Pre-configured aqueous cell test protocols for the HPS-17000 cycler. C-rate sweep templates optimized for the 2.2V aqueous window, EIS baselines for COP/PBA impedance signatures, automated degradation tracking.
Markets: R&D labs evaluating aqueous chemistries
Parent: Product 2 (NI Characterization Package) — software layer
Advantage: First-published data defines the protocol standard
S1 (Value Chain) · ELECTROLYTE SOURCING
Aqueous Electrolyte Preparation Skid
Phase 1 Priority
Turnkey DeltaV-controlled system combining Rosemount 228, pH sensors, Micro Motion meters, and Fisher valves. Aqueous battery manufacturers worldwide need electrolyte preparation. Emerson becomes the “Intel Inside” of the electrolyte layer.
S3 (Value Chain) · CELL TESTING
NI Aqueous Cell Characterization Package
Phase 1 Priority
PXI-based test system pre-configured for aqueous chemistries: EIS, ACIR, DCIR, OCV protocols calibrated for 2.2V range and aqueous impedance. First-to-market instrument for R&D labs evaluating this technology.
S4 (Value Chain) · GRID DEPLOYMENT
Zitara Aqueous BMS Profile
SoC/SoH algorithms tuned to aqueous electrochemistry’s different voltage curves, impedance, and degradation modes. Integrated into Ovation Green. Operator lock-in for deployed aqueous BESS assets.
S2 (Value Chain) · MANUFACTURING
AspenTech Aqueous Battery Digital Twin
Process simulation model covering electrolyte prep through formation cycling. Operators optimize production virtually before commissioning. Vertical extension of existing AspenTech chemical processing capability.
S4 (Value Chain) · GRID DEPLOYMENT
AgriStorage Microgrid Package
Turnkey microgrid for rural cooperatives combining Ovation Green BESS with aqueous modules. Midwest wind + cooperative power + USDA funding alignment, a geographic thesis detailed in The Midwest Corridor. Emerson’s Liebert expertise applied to a new channel.
S1 (Value Chain) · ELECTROLYTE SOURCING
Sustainable Electrolyte Recovery System
DeltaV-controlled recovery of battery-grade MgCl₂ from desalination waste brine. Sixteen thousand plants dump 120 million cubic meters of MgCl₂-rich brine daily. Emerson’s process automation and Rosemount sensors are purpose-built for this recovery. While competitors fight over lithium mines, Emerson builds batteries from recovered waste.
S4 (Value Chain) · GRID DEPLOYMENT
Aqueous Electrolyte Stewardship Service
An annual maintenance subscription for deployed aqueous BESS. Rosemount inline ICP monitors dissolved metals (primarily Cu from CuFe-PBA leaching); when thresholds cross, an electrowinning module recovers ~95% of the metal; the cleaned electrolyte returns to service. Per installation, the recovered copper offsets a small share of service cost. The bigger value is operational: a documented closed-loop for the customer’s ESG report, RCRA-compliant by design, and the only BESS service in market that takes its own waste back. Recurring revenue + sustainability differentiator.
S5 (Value Chain) · OPERATIONS
Plantweb Insight Aqueous Fleet Diagnostic Module
SaaS module on the existing Plantweb Insight platform. Cross-asset diagnostics for deployed aqueous BESS fleets: cell-level voltage drift, electrolyte conductivity trends, water-activity warnings, copper-accumulation curves. Integrates Zitara BMS, Rosemount sensors, and Ovation Green telemetry under one analytic. Recurring license, per-asset pricing. Plantweb already serves 60M+ assets across Emerson’s installed base, this is the same channel applied to a new asset class.
The electrolyte is not consumed.
It is not chemically transformed.

After a hundred thousand cycles,
the salt water is still salt water.
— after Chen et al.
Nature Communications, February 2026

The Self-Hosted Pilot: Emerson Eating Its Own Cooking

The most compelling demonstration Emerson can make is deploying this technology at its own facility, using its own instruments, and powering its own operations.

Emerson’s global headquarters for Rosemount technologies, Shakopee, Minnesota — 500,000 square feet of manufacturing and R&D space. This is where the instruments are made. A self-hosted aqueous battery pilot here would demonstrate the full Emerson product stack, on Emerson’s own floor, powering Emerson’s own operations. Photo: McGough Construction
FROM BRINE TO BATTERY: THE EMERSON VALUE CHAIN
Five stages · One company · Ten revenue streams · $370M–$1.04B annual opportunity
SOURCE
Raw Material
Desalination brine
Nedmag (NL)
K+S AG (DE)
Intrepid Potash (US)

MgCl₂ from waste brine or ancient underground deposits
S1
Electrolyte Prep & QA
Rosemount 228
Rosemount 372 pH
Micro Motion ELITE
DeltaV · AspenTech

Conductivity, density, pH monitoring. Process automation.
S2
Cell Manufacturing
Micro Motion Fork
Afag Linear Motion
Rosemount 928 Gas
Fisher/ASCO Valves

Electrode slurry, cell assembly, gas monitoring.
S3
Testing & Characterization
NI PXI (EIS)
NI HPS-17000 Cycler
EECOMOBILITY AI

The critical stage: C-rate performance at grid scale.
S4
Grid Deployment
Ovation Green BESS
Zitara BMS
Prevalon Energy
Liebert (Data Ctr)

Chemistry-agnostic. Deployed. Commercial.
$370M – $1.04B   ANNUAL REVENUE AT SCALE
Shakopee production floor
Shakopee production floor from the mezzanine. When the Chihuahua site absorbs half of the pressure and DP level lines by end of 2027, production bays like these become available floor space—ready to host a self-contained aqueous battery pilot without displacing a single active line. Photo: Emerson / Shakopee

Phase 2 vision: Source food-grade MgCl₂ from Nedmag (fully non-evaporative underground solution mining) or Intrepid Potash (underground solution mining, solar evaporation final step), prioritizing the lowest-impact pathway available. Prepare electrolyte using a DeltaV-controlled skid with Rosemount sensors. Acquire prototype cells from the City University of Hong Kong collaboration. Characterize them at grid-relevant C-rates using NI PXI battery cyclers, answering the single biggest open scientific question. Deploy a small-scale aqueous BESS at an Emerson facility. Monitor with Ovation Green and Zitara. Power a portion of the facility with it.

On supply. Nedmag’s Veendam deposit holds an estimated 1.5–2.0 billion tonnes MgCl₂-equivalent. At full Phase 3 scale (3–5% of global stationary storage), Emerson demand projects 50,000–150,000 tonnes/yr — supporting >100 years from a single supplier, before counting Track B (Intrepid Potash, US) or Track C (desalination brine, effectively infinite). Running out is not a Phase 1–4 concern.

Why This Matters

A self-hosted pilot generates the exact data set every future customer will demand: real-world cycle performance, electrolyte preparation costs, safety metrics, total cost of ownership. It demonstrates Emerson’s complete product stack working in concert. And it produces a sustainability proof point: Emerson powers its own operations with non-toxic, water-based batteries made from commodity mineral salts, prepared, tested, and managed by Emerson instruments. The ESG case. The safety standard. On our own floor.

The Market Opportunity

Three markets where safety and cycle life matter more than energy density.

The Market

The Data Center Boom

Water is the new lithium.
Every new data center is a fight over it.
Photo: Google / Connie Zhou · Council Bluffs, Iowa
Google data center, Council Bluffs, Iowa. Hyperscale facilities like this one consume 1–5 million gallons of fresh water per day for cooling. Communities from Oregon to Uruguay have blocked or challenged new data center construction over water rights. The battery room inside these facilities is the market. Photo: Google / Connie Zhou

AI and cloud computing are driving accelerating data center construction. These facilities require massive stationary backup. Three characteristics make aqueous batteries compelling: continuous daily cycling (the battery outlasts the facility), non-flammable chemistry (eliminates thermal runaway, simplifies building codes, reduces insurance), and standard waste disposal (no hazardous materials liability). Emerson’s Prevalon partnership and Liebert division serve hyperscale operators. The channel exists.

⚠ THE WATER CRISIS IN DATA CENTERS

Hyperscale data centers consume 1–5 million gallons of fresh water per day for cooling. Water diverted from municipal sources and lost to atmosphere through cooling towers. Google consumed 5.6 billion gallons in 2022 (up 20% year-over-year). Microsoft consumed 6.4 billion gallons that same year (up 34%), driven by AI workload scaling. Communities are pushing back: The Dalles, Oregon blocked Google expansion after learning the campus consumed 25% of municipal water. Mesa, Arizona protested Meta over groundwater depletion. Uruguay, Chile, and Ireland have imposed moratoriums or environmental reviews on new data center construction. The opposition increasingly centers on water, not energy.

Aqueous battery chemistry introduces a different relationship with water. The electrolyte is contained water: it does not evaporate, it does not leave the system. Lithium-ion BESS installations require water-based fire suppression systems (NFPA 855), and a single thermal runaway event can consume 10,000–30,000+ gallons for suppression, compounding the water burden at facilities already under municipal pressure. Aqueous chemistry eliminates this entirely: no thermal runaway, no suppression infrastructure, no water liability. Google, Microsoft, and Meta have all pledged to be “water positive” by 2030. A battery that is water by design, one that never risks consuming emergency water to put itself out, is the kind of technology those pledges need.

Rural Cooperatives & Agricultural Microgrids

Rural electric cooperatives serve 42 million Americans across 56% of the nation’s landmass. Long-life, low-maintenance stationary storage aligns with cooperative needs: decades of asset life, minimal hazardous waste, USDA rural energy grant eligibility. The cooperative channel is detailed in The Midwest Corridor section.

Riceland Foods cooperative facility
USDA Agricultural Research Service · Image K7577-4 · Public Domain. Riceland Foods Cooperative, Stuttgart, AR. A 10,000-member cooperative founded in 1921 in the Arkansas Delta — the heart of American rice country. Rural cooperatives like Riceland serve 42 million Americans across 56% of the nation’s landmass, from the Mississippi Delta to the Great Plains wind corridor. Stationary storage that lasts decades and never catches fire is built for this market.

The Electrolyte Supply Chain: Abundant, Domestic—and an Opportunity to Lead

Unlike lithium and cobalt, the materials for this battery are abundant, domestic, and cheap. But how they are sourced matters, and Emerson has an opportunity to set the gold standard.

1,700
Thousand tonnes
global MgCl₂ production/yr
vs. lithium: 180K tonnes
$738M
Global MgCl₂
market (2025)
$200–600/ton industrial
3.7%
MgCl₂ content
of seawater
Effectively unlimited
FDA
GRAS rated
No export controls
Ships as non-hazardous

The Problem with Traditional Extraction

The dominant method for producing MgCl₂ in the United States is solar evaporation: pumping brine from saline lakes into shallow ponds and letting the sun boil the water away. At the Great Salt Lake in Utah, mineral extraction companies operate over 110,000 acres of evaporation ponds that have consumed up to 270,000 acre-feet of water annually. The lake has shrunk to historic lows. Environmental groups are suing the state. The extraction method that produces much of America’s MgCl₂ is actively destroying the ecosystem it depends on.

Aerial view of Great Salt Lake mineral evaporation ponds, Utah. The vivid colors (pink, green, tan) reveal different mineral salt concentrations across the extraction grid. Current MgCl₂ sourcing depends on solar evaporation from this shrinking saline lake, an unsustainable extraction model that consumes up to 270,000 acre-feet of water annually. The Zechstein underground deposits and desalination waste brine offer a path forward. Photo: Mary Anne Karren / EcoFlight · Used with permission
⚠ THE COST OF THE STATUS QUO

As the Great Salt Lake shrinks, it exposes thousands of acres of lakebed sediment laced with arsenic, mercury, and heavy metals accumulated over millennia. Wind carries this toxic dust across the Wasatch Front, elevating particulate matter concentrations for 2.5 million residents. Respiratory disease, cardiovascular risk, and environmental degradation are the direct consequences of the lake’s decline, a decline driven in part by the 270,000 acre-feet of water consumed annually by mineral extraction operations like US Magnesium (an EPA Superfund site) and Compass Minerals.

The consequences are concrete: a public health crisis caused by the very extraction model that currently supplies MgCl₂. The Zechstein underground deposits and desalination waste brine offer a sourcing pathway that produces zero airborne particulates, consumes zero surface water, and depletes zero saline lakes. Emerson can build this battery without contributing to the destruction of the Great Salt Lake.

Emerson does not need to accept this. MgCl₂ is one of the most abundant mineral salts on Earth, and non-destructive alternatives exist today:

Sustainable Sourcing Pathways

Desalination brine recovery
Net Positive
MgCl₂ recovered from waste brine produced by seawater desalination plants (120M m³/day globally).
Reduces ocean pollution while producing battery feedstock. Target pathway.
Underground solution mining
Minimal Impact
Ancient bischofite deposits (250-million-year-old crystallized MgCl₂) dissolved and pumped from underground.
No water evaporation. Nedmag and K+S AG operate this way in Europe.
Seawater reactive precipitation (Dow process)
Proven
Lime added to seawater precipitates Mg(OH)₂, filtered and reacted with HCl to produce MgCl₂.
Water returned to ocean. Commercially proven since WWII.
Industrial byproduct recovery
Circular
MgCl₂ produced as byproduct of Solvay process and other chemical manufacturing.
Waste stream valorization—no new extraction required.
Solar evaporation (traditional)
Destructive
Lake brine pumped into ponds, water evaporated by sun, salts scraped from pond floor.
Consumes water permanently from vulnerable saline lakes. Not recommended.
Emerson’s Sustainability Position

Emerson can establish a sustainable electrolyte sourcing standard: committing to non-evaporative MgCl₂ for its aqueous battery products, prioritizing desalination brine recovery and underground deposits over destructive lake evaporation. While competitors source lithium from open-pit mines and cobalt from conflict regions, Emerson builds batteries from recovered waste and ancient underground deposits. A position competitors cannot replicate.

K+S AG Merkers salt mine, Thuringia, Germany
Mining museum at 505 meters depth inside the K+S AG Merkers salt mine, Thuringia, Germany. This is the Zechstein formation — salt beds laid down 257 million years ago when the Permian sea evaporated across what is now northern Europe. K+S AG extracts potash and magnesium salts from these deposits using room-and-pillar mining at 500–1,000m depth. Nedmag in the Netherlands operates similar Zechstein deposits via solution mining at 1,500m+. No evaporation ponds. No lake depletion. No surface disturbance. The commodity is older than the dinosaurs, and the supply is measured in centuries. Photo: A.Savin · Free Art License

Supplier Landscape: Transparent and Complete

SupplierLocationSourceMethodNotes
Non-Evaporative / Sustainable
NedmagNetherlandsZechstein bischofite (250-million-year-old deposits)Underground solution mining, 1500m+ depthIndustrial processing, no evaporation. Minor surface subsidence monitored.
K+S AGGermanyZechstein underground depositsRoom-and-pillar mining, 500–1000m depthFlotation processing, no evaporation. Tailings management is an ongoing concern.
Desalination brine recoveryGlobal (emerging)Waste brine from seawater desalination (120M m³/day globally)Waste valorizationPollution-to-feedstock pathway. Recovers MgCl₂ currently dumped as ocean pollutant. Net positive environmental impact.
Hybrid — Underground Extraction, Solar Evaporation Final Step
Intrepid PotashDenver, COUnderground brine deposits — Wendover, UT; Moab, UT; Carlsbad, NMUnderground solution mining + solar evaporationNo lake drainage, no surface water intake. However, brine water is lost to atmosphere during final solar evaporation step. Lower impact than lake evaporation but not fully non-evaporative.
Solar Evaporation / Environmental Concerns
Compass MineralsOverland Park, KSGreat Salt Lake, Utah — 55,000 acres of evaporation pondsSolar evaporationDirect extraction from a shrinking saline lake. Significant water consumption.
CargillMinneapolis, MNGreat Salt Lake brine via US Magnesium infrastructureSolar evaporation (indirect)Dependent on US Magnesium’s extraction infrastructure at the Great Salt Lake.
ICL GroupIsraelDead Sea evaporation pondsSolar evaporationDead Sea extraction contributes to declining water levels in one of the world’s most fragile ecosystems.
Severe Environmental Concern
US MagnesiumRowley, UTGreat Salt Lake — 80,000+ acres of evaporation pondsSolar evaporationEPA Superfund site. Filed for bankruptcy September 2025; the State of Utah purchased the facility in February 2026 to protect Great Salt Lake water levels. Largest single-source water depletion at the Great Salt Lake. Worst environmental profile of any MgCl₂ supplier.
USGS · Underground potash deposits, Intrepid Potash Carlsbad West Mine, New Mexico. Ancient brine deposits like these provide non-evaporative, sustainable sources of magnesium chloride — no surface water consumed. USGS Open-File Report 2016-1167

Fully non-evaporative supply exists today through Nedmag and K+S AG in Europe, with Intrepid Potash offering a lower-impact hybrid approach (underground solution mining with solar evaporation as the final step, no lake drainage, no surface water intake). Desalination brine recovery represents the most sustainable long-term pathway. The supply chain is diversified and abundant, and Emerson has the choice to source responsibly from day one.

Strait of Hormuz — MODIS satellite image
Strait of Hormuz. Twenty-one miles wide. Thirty percent of the world’s seaborne oil passes through it every day. The Gulf states on either side operate the largest desalination plants on Earth. The same plants whose waste brine contains the electrolyte.
MODIS / NASA Terra satellite · Public Domain

The Desalination Opportunity: Waste to Feedstock

Every day, 16,000 desalination plants produce 142 million cubic meters of MgCl₂/CaCl₂-rich brine. Almost all of it is dumped into the ocean. The electrolyte is waste. The waste is free.

Global Desalination — Brine Going to Waste
142M
m³ brine/day
Dumped into oceans globally
16,000
Plants worldwide
Zero recover MgCl₂ at scale
$0
Feedstock cost
Plants pay to dispose of it
Supply trajectory
More drought → more desal → more brine
Desalination Capacity by Region
United States
Carlsbad, CA — 50M gal/day brine
Tampa Bay, FL — 25M gal/day
120+ plants in Florida alone
Texas — $6B expansion planned
Carlsbad spent $286M upgrading discharge to reduce marine damage
Spain & Mediterranean
765 plants — 65% of EU capacity
5M m³/day of desalinated water
Italy, Cyprus, Malta, Greece
1,200 plants across Med basin
EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive tightening discharge rules
Gulf States & MENA
Largest global capacity
Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar
Over 50% of global brine output
100M+ people depend on desal water
Arabian Gulf salinity rising 5–10 g/L above baseline from discharge
Why Mining Still Exists

Mined MgCl₂ from Zechstein deposits is pristine, sealed from contaminants for 257 million years. Desalination brine requires additional purification to remove trace antiscalants and biocides. But this battery operates in saturated aqueous salt solution at neutral pH. Industrial-grade MgCl₂ meets the requirement. The purity bar is dramatically lower than lithium-ion, making brine recovery commercially viable.

Mined deposits remain the strategic reserve: centuries of supply, zero environmental controversy. Desalination waste becomes the primary feedstock: negative cost, growing supply, and a circular economy case without precedent in the industry. Three tiers: desalination waste (target), natural brine lakes (established), underground deposits (reserve).

Dissolved magnesium and chloride have been in Earth’s oceans since the Archean, three and a half billion years, older than multicellular life. There is no supply constraint at any scale humanity can reach.

The Emerson Connection

Emerson already instruments desalination plants worldwide: Rosemount flow sensors monitoring intake volumes, conductivity sensors tracking brine concentration, pH analyzers ensuring discharge compliance. The Barcelona desalination facility on the cover of this section is an Emerson-instrumented plant. A DeltaV-controlled brine recovery skid expands an existing customer relationship. Emerson would be selling the same instruments to the same plants, for a new purpose: converting their most expensive waste stream into the electrolyte for a new class of battery. The customer already knows Emerson’s name. The instruments are in the catalog. The brine is flowing.

Act III

The Case

The corridor. The market. The champions.
Meta Rosemount data center campus — aerial rendering, Dakota County, Minnesota
FIFTEEN MILES FROM SHAKOPEE
Meta’s $800M Rosemount Campus
The city shares its name with Emerson’s measurement division.
The buildout is on our doorstep.
Meta Rosemount data center campus, Dakota County — Rendering: Meta Platforms
Act III · The Case

The Midwest Corridor

Every technology needs a geographic home. For aqueous stationary storage, that home is the American Midwest.

Every technology needs a geographic home. For aqueous stationary storage, that home is the American Midwest, where Emerson’s manufacturing base, wind energy, data center expansion, and cooperative infrastructure converge into a natural market entry corridor.

Soybean field with wind turbines, Minonk Township, Illinois
Wind farm and agricultural land, Minonk Township, Illinois. Wind energy, grain infrastructure, cooperative power. The Midwest Corridor thesis in one frame. Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

The largest battery installation ever announced is being built ~60 miles from Shakopee. Google’s Pine Island data center campus will pair 1,400 MW of new wind and 200 MW of solar generation with 300 MW / 30 GWh of Form Energy iron-air battery storage — 100-hour discharge duration to firm intermittent renewables and bridge multi-day lulls toward 24/7 carbon-free energy.

Pine Island is not an outlier. It is the leading edge of a buildout that is remaking the Upper Midwest:

But the buildout is hitting a wall. Industry estimates indicate that 30–50% of U.S. data center capacity planned for 2026 has been delayed or cancelled. Not for lack of demand, but for lack of power infrastructure: transformers, switchgear, and batteries. The constraint is not whether data centers will be built. It is whether the grid can power them.

These facilities need grid-scale storage. All of them currently default to lithium-ion, the chemistry that burned Moss Landing and shut down a government data center in South Korea. The convergence is strategic. Four advantages meet here:

1 · The Buildout Is Here

Data center construction, wind energy generation, and 900+ rural electric cooperatives converge in the same corridor where Emerson’s Shakopee headquarters sits. Google’s Pine Island campus alone represents 30 GWh of storage demand. The logistics of a first deployment are measured in trucking distance, not time zones.

2 · Wind Needs Storage

The 1,400 MW of wind and 200 MW of solar feeding Pine Island are intermittent by nature. Grid-scale storage converts intermittent renewables into dispatchable power. Lithium provides 4–6 hours of duration; iron-air provides 100-hour duration — Form Energy delivered its first commercial system (1.5 MW / 150 MWh at Great River Energy in Cambridge MN) in late 2025; GWh-scale deliveries begin 2027 (Crusoe), with Pine Island scheduled 2028–2031. An aqueous salt battery that survives 120,000 cycles without degradation offers a third path, one that Emerson can instrument, monitor, and control with its own products.

3 · The Tofu Connection

U.S. tofu manufacturing ($467M market, 13% annual growth) already procures food-grade MgCl₂/CaCl₂. These energy-intensive facilities (cooking, pressing, refrigeration) operate in food-safety environments where non-flammable chemistry is a regulatory advantage. A tofu manufacturer is the ideal first customer for an aqueous battery pilot: the electrolyte feedstock is already on-site, the safety case is strongest, and the marketing is built into the product. The same mineral salt that coagulates your tofu stores the energy that powers the factory.

4 · Cooperative Infrastructure

More than 900 rural electric cooperatives operate across the Upper Midwest, many of them already integrating wind generation and seeking storage solutions. USDA rural energy grant programs provide federal co-funding for exactly this category of deployment. The cooperative channel gives Emerson a path to distributed, high-volume deployments: hundreds of small installations rather than one flagship project.

16,000
desalination plants
142 million m³
of MgCl₂/CaCl₂-rich brine — produced every day
Almost all of it is dumped into the ocean.
The electrolyte is waste. The waste is free.

Financial Frame: Sizing the Opportunity

Order-of-magnitude estimates intended to provide leadership with a frame for evaluating scale against cost. Not financial projections.

Combined Annual Opportunity at Scale
$370M–$1.04B
Seven product categories · Ten revenue streams · Recurring software revenue
Emerson Revenue LayerMechanismIllustrative Annual Revenue at Scale
Electrolyte preparation skidsDeltaV + Rosemount + Fisher equipment sale per line$50–150M
NI cell test systemsPXI platforms to R&D labs and QA lines$30–80M
Ovation Green BESS licensingPer-site software licensing and controls$80–200M
Zitara BMS subscriptionsRecurring per-MWh software revenue$20–60M
Afag cell assembly automationProduction line equipment$40–100M
AgriStorage microgrid packagesTurnkey cooperative systems$30–80M
Sustainable electrolyte recovery systemsDeltaV-controlled desalination brine MgCl₂ recovery$40–120M
Electrolyte replenishment & consumablesRecurring MgCl₂/CaCl₂ supply contracts for deployed BESS installations$50–150M
Certification & standards testingThird-party aqueous electrolyte QA validated against Rosemount reference instruments$20–60M
Environmental credit bundlingVerified credits from desalination brine remediation, bundled with Product 6 systems$10–40M
COMBINED OPPORTUNITY

$370M–$1.04B in annual revenue at scale

One decision to begin.

Levelized Cost of Storage — Per Cycle, Per kWh
$0.013–$0.025
$130–$150/kWh
÷
6,000–10,000
cycles
Lithium-Ion (LFP)
Replace every 8–10 years
$0.0003–$0.0005
Aqueous Salt (projected)
329 years at 1 cycle/day
40–80×
cheaper per unit of energy delivered over the battery’s life
Levelized cost = installed cost per kWh ÷ total lifetime cycles. Lithium: $130–$150/kWh at 6,000–10,000 cycles. Aqueous (projected): $32–$64/kWh at 120,000 cycles. Cycle life at grid rates is unproven — this is the Phase 1 question.

Methodology: The global stationary energy storage market is projected at $120B+ annually by 2030 (BNEF), growing to $200B+ by 2035 as data center, grid, and microgrid demand accelerates. Revenue estimates above assume aqueous chemistries capture 3–5% of new stationary installations at scale, with Emerson’s instrumentation, software, and integration layer representing 8–15% of total system cost, consistent with historical automation-layer revenue shares in comparable energy infrastructure (oil & gas: ~12%, water treatment: ~10%). The actual figure depends on adoption speed, competitive dynamics, and Emerson’s market share. Phase 1 is designed to determine which end of that range is realistic. That is what $200K–$400K buys: the right to know.

Note: Some revenue streams share upstream components (e.g., electrolyte preparation skids and sustainable recovery systems both use DeltaV and Rosemount sensors). The combined range accounts for this overlap; the low end assumes significant cannibalization, the high end assumes distinct customer segments. These are order-of-magnitude frames, not financial projections.

Competitive Landscape

No American industrial automation company has publicly positioned itself in the aqueous battery space as of April 2026. Pre-announcement R&D at competitors is inherently opaque; this analysis is based on public information and should be read accordingly.

Siemens
SIEMENS
ABB
ABB
Schneider Electric
SCHNEIDER
GE Vernova
GE VERNOVA
HONEYWELL
CompetitorPositionEmerson’s Differentiation
Siemens EnergyActive in grid BESS via Fluence JV (lithium-ion only)No electrolyte instrumentation, no NI-equivalent test platform, no battery mfg automation
ABBGrid automation via Hitachi Energy JV; BESS integrationNo Afag equivalent, no Prevalon-like data center channel, no Rosemount sensor stack
Schneider ElectricEMS, SCADA, EcoStruxure microgrid deploymentsNo cell-level test instrumentation, no electrolyte QA portfolio, European HQ
GE VernovaGrid-scale controls; reservoir BESS platform (lithium-ion)No visible aqueous R&D, no end-to-end sensor-to-BMS product stack
HoneywellProcess automation; Honeywell Forge BESS software; iron-flow battery R&DNo battery test platform, no Zitara-equivalent BMS, no Prevalon-equivalent channel
StartupsSeveral aqueous battery cos.None with Emerson’s integration platform, test instrumentation, data center channel, or Midwest footprint
Emerson’s Vertical Integration — From Raw Salt to Grid
Raw MgCl₂
Intrepid Potash
$200–600/ton
DeltaV Skid
Purification
Recipe Control
Rosemount
228 / 372 / ELITE
Electrolyte QA
Afag Assembly
Automated
Cell Build
NI Test
HPS-17000
EIS + Cycling
Zitara BMS
Battery Mgmt
Software
Ovation Green
Grid BESS
Deployment
Each node is an Emerson product. No competitor touches more than one stage.
Value Chain Coverage · 4 Stages
Siemens
1 of 4
ABB
1 of 4
Schneider
1 of 4
GE Vernova
1 of 4
Honeywell
1 of 4
Emerson
4 of 4
Stages: S1 Electrolyte Prep · S2 Cell Manufacturing · S3 Testing & Characterization · S4 Grid Deployment
Competitive coverage matrix. Emerson is the only company that spans all four stages of the aqueous battery value chain. Each competitor covers at most one stage. This full-stack integration — from electrolyte QA sensors to grid deployment software — is the moat.
First-Mover Window: 12–18 Months

The urgency is not about waiting for commercialization. The urgency is about securing the licensing relationship with the Hong Kong research group before a competitor makes that call, and establishing Ovation Green as the controls standard before the market has alternatives. Emerson’s existing China footprint and leadership relationships make this call possible now.

Risk Factors and Mitigations

The Asymmetry, in One Sentence

A $1.0M–$1.8M Phase 1 — gated by a $200K–$400K Stage 0 kill-switch. If the science fails Stage 0, everything stops at <0.001% of the upside. If it passes, Emerson owns the answer to the question every grid-storage lab is racing to ask.

Opportunity carries risk. What matters is whether the risks are addressable and the cost of investigation is proportionate to the prize. The risks below are addressable; the cost of investigation is bounded.

Technology maturity: lab-proven, not commercial
High
Phase 1 is intelligence, not capital. No significant spend until viability is independently confirmed.
Energy density too low for broad adoption
Medium
Strategy explicitly targets stationary storage only. Limitation is a feature, not a blind spot.
COP anode synthesis has not been scaled
Medium-High
The covalent organic polymer anode is synthesized at lab scale. Industrial-scale polymer synthesis requires consistent porosity, controlled radical site density, and economical solvent systems. None of this has been demonstrated. Phase 1 scopes the synthesis pathway and cost envelope; if scale-up proves uneconomical, alternative polymer anodes in the published literature offer fallback candidates. This is a chemical engineering problem, not a physics barrier.
Core IP held by Hong Kong institution
Medium-High
The core IP resides at City University of Hong Kong, which maintains a distinct technology transfer regime and regularly licenses to Western companies. US regulations (CFIUS, export controls) do not restrict inbound licensing of non-dual-use academic IP. The regulatory landscape is evolving: MOFCOM’s export catalogue added battery electrode preparation technologies in 2023–2024, and Hong Kong’s regulatory environment is gradually converging with the mainland. However, the foundational science is already published in Nature Communications. The public chemistry is accessible; what requires licensing is the patent portfolio and unpublished process know-how. Emerson’s existing relationships make this navigable: Ram Krishnan’s Hong Kong operational history, Karsanbhai’s US-China Business Council access, and Jennie Li’s direct institutional relationships in China. Phase 1 includes trade counsel assessment and early outreach. A collaborative licensing relationship benefits both sides: CityU gains a commercialization partner with global instrumentation reach, and Emerson gains first-mover access to the next generation of aqueous chemistry research.
Electrolyte feedstock is not a moat
Low
MgCl₂ is a commodity. Emerson’s moat is in products and integration, not feedstock.
Competing aqueous chemistries may win
Medium
Ovation Green, DeltaV, Rosemount, NI, and Zitara are all chemistry-agnostic. Emerson wins regardless of which formulation prevails.
Competitor intelligence is incomplete
Medium
Analysis is based on public information. Speed matters.
Hong Kong skyline from Victoria Peak

The Champions: Who Carries This Forward

This proposal identifies specific Emerson leaders whose existing mandates, expertise, and relationships align with the opportunity.

Victoria Harbour at dusk — Joybot · CC BY-SA 2.0

The sequence matters. First contact starts in Hong Kong.

Jennie Li
Jennie Li
Vice President & General Manager, Emerson China
The person who makes first contact. Joined Emerson in 2003 as principal representative for government relations in China; promoted to VP & GM in 2018. Oversees all Emerson strategy and operations in China, with direct relationships across Chinese academic institutions and government departments. Named one of Fortune China’s “25 Most Influential Businesswomen” (2016) and Forbes’ “100 Outstanding Women in Business in China” for four consecutive years. Bachelor’s from Beijing Foreign Studies University, EMBA from China Europe International Business School. She is Emerson’s operational link to City University of Hong Kong and the research group that holds the core IP.
Ram Krishnan
Ram Krishnan
EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Metallurgical engineering degree from IIT. Previously president of Climate Technologies in Asia, based in Hong Kong, the same city as the lead research institution. Led the Afag acquisition (battery manufacturing automation). Oversees M&A. The executive sponsor with the technical background and Asia relationships for first contact.
Bob Yeager
Bob Yeager
President, Power & Water Solutions
Owns Ovation Green BESS, the Zitara partnership, and the Prevalon data center channel. Publicly stated that battery energy management “aligns perfectly with our vision.” Launched BESS software June 2025. Keynoting Clean Currents 2026 on next-gen power. The direct business owner for this opportunity.
Thurston Cromwell
Thurston Cromwell
Vice President, Development & Innovation
Already invested Emerson Ventures capital in Zitara (battery management) and EECOMOBILITY (AI battery testing). $100M committed fund for “environmentally sustainable technologies.” The investment mandate holder.
Lal Karsanbhai
Lal Karsanbhai
President & CEO
Former president of Rosemount Measurement & Analytical. Understands the sensor/instrumentation angle at product level. Sits on the U.S.-China Business Council board. Has the institutional access and product comprehension to connect the dots at the highest level.
Michael Train
Michael Train
SVP & Chief Sustainability Officer
Train joined Emerson in 1991 and served as president of Rosemount (2008–2010), the Shakopee business unit that would host the pilot, before leading global sales for Process Management, then serving as president of Emerson (2018–2021). Electrical engineering degree from GMI, MBA from Cornell. He knows the Shakopee campus, the sensor portfolio, and the safety standards at a level no other champion matches. As Emerson’s first Chief Sustainability Officer, he owns the ESG narrative: a domestically-sourced, non-toxic, zero-hazardous-waste battery technology is the flagship demonstration his mandate was created for.
MM
Michael Muck
Vice President, Global Operations & Supply Chain — Measurement Solutions
The strategic hero. Mechanical engineering degree from Washington University in St. Louis, MBA from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Based in Shakopee. Conducts quarterly all-employee meetings covering numbers, safety, benefits, and increasingly sustainability. Green-lit the prior Shakopee geothermal heating R&D pilot (deep drilling, the science came up empty, never followed up) — demonstrated organizational muscle memory and unfilled appetite for an energy/sustainability win on this campus. Holds the macro Twin Cities agency: he is the level where execution authority and campus-level energy R&D sponsorship converge. Routing: floor → Logan → Rodolphe (sponsors to Muck) → Muck (the hero) → Stokes.
Rodolphe El Khoury
Rodolphe El Khoury
Vice President, North America Operations — Measurement Solutions
Mechanical engineer with a supply chain master’s from HEC Paris. Runs North America operations for Measurement Solutions at the Shakopee campus, ground zero for a pilot deployment. Previously led Emerson’s manufacturing operations across Romania (Cluj), Dubai, and Saudi Arabia, building direct relationships with the geographies that source both electrolyte feedstocks: Zechstein MgCl₂ from Nedmag in the Netherlands via Cluj, and desalination waste brine from the Gulf states. An engineer who has managed supply chains on three continents, now based at the building where the first aqueous battery skid would be assembled. The operations leader who bridges Shakopee manufacturing with the global electrolyte supply chain he knows.

The Intellectual Property Question — and Emerson’s Strategic Independence

The science is published. The process is ours. What follows is the IP analysis, the engagement plan with CityU, and the case for proceeding whether or not that engagement succeeds.

What the Publication Means

The Chen et al. paper was published in Nature Communications, an open-access journal. That matters legally. Publication is disclosure. The scientific findings — MgCl₂ electrolyte, CuFe-PBA cathode, COP anode, 120,000-cycle durability, 2.2V operating window — are now public knowledge, available to every researcher, company, and government on Earth. That is what publication means. That is what the scientists chose when they submitted to Nature Communications rather than filing a patent and developing the technology behind closed doors.

The material classes used in the battery — Prussian blue analog cathodes, conducting organic polymer anodes, aqueous chloride electrolytes — are all established in the electrochemical literature, with prior art stretching back decades. CuFe-PBA is one variant among many studied since the early 2000s. No entity can patent broad classes of materials or fundamental electrochemical principles. What can be patented, and likely has been, are specific implementations: exact electrode compositions, specific synthesis routes, particular electrolyte formulations, and the precise combination of these elements in a specific cell architecture.

THE DISTINCTION
What CityU likely owns (patent claims)
Specific electrode ratios and synthesis procedures. Exact electrolyte concentration and additives. The particular cell architecture as described in the paper. Unpublished process know-how and refinements not disclosed in the publication.
What nobody owns (public science)
The principle of Mg²⁺ intercalation into PBA lattices. The general class of Prussian blue analog cathodes. MgCl₂ as a battery electrolyte. The published performance data. The chemistry itself.

Emerson’s Moat Is the Process, Not the Formula

Here is the point: Emerson is not attempting to manufacture the exact battery described in the paper. Emerson is building the industrial process that transforms published chemistry into manufacturable, monitorable, maintainable grid-scale energy storage. The value is in the instrumentation, the control systems, the purification protocols, and the quality monitoring infrastructure — none of which comes from CityU.

Emerson-Original IP (no CityU dependency)
DeltaV electrolyte preparation recipe — the closed-loop control system that orchestrates purification from industrial feedstock to battery-grade. This is a proprietary process recipe, developed on Emerson’s own distributed control platform, with no precedent in the paper.

Rosemount sensor configurations for electrolyte health monitoring — the specific application of toroidal conductivity (228), pH/ORP (372/3900), and Coriolis density (Micro Motion ELITE) to real-time battery electrolyte quality. No published literature describes this configuration. It is industrial measurement applied to a new domain.

NI test protocols for cycling and degradation characterization — the HPS-17000 cycling profiles, EIS impedance spectroscopy schedules, and EECOMOBILITY analysis workflows tailored for aqueous Mg²⁺ chemistry. These are test engineering deliverables, not chemistry IP.

Copper remediation loop — the integration of Rosemount continuous monitoring with electrowinning recovery (emew/ElectraMet partnership) to close the copper contamination cycle. This turns a degradation mechanism into a revenue stream. CityU identified the problem; Emerson engineers the solution.

Product 6: Sustainable Electrolyte Recovery System — the DeltaV purification skid adapted for desalination brine feedstock. This product concept does not exist in the paper or in CityU’s research. It is entirely an Emerson innovation, enabled by Track B process development.

Ovation Green BESS integration and Zitara BMS — the software and controls layer that connects aqueous battery modules to building electrical systems and the grid. This is Emerson’s existing product portfolio applied to a new chemistry.

The Engagement Strategy: Partnership, Not Competition

The recommended first move is diplomatic, harmonious, and strategically sound. Emerson approaches CityU not as a competitor attempting to replicate their work, but as an industrial partner offering something the research group cannot build alone: a global instrumentation platform capable of taking published chemistry from lab bench to grid deployment.

Recommended Engagement Sequence
Step 1
Freedom-to-Operate Memo
Engage international IP counsel with China/HK specialty. Search CityU patent filings (if any exist). Produce a clear FTO memo within 4–6 weeks. Budget: $20K–$40K. This answers the legal question before any outreach occurs. Emerson knows where it stands legally before picking up the phone.
Step 2
Initial Outreach via Emerson China
Jennie Li (VP & GM, Emerson China) initiates contact with CityU’s technology transfer office. The framing: Emerson wants to discuss a potential collaboration around industrializing aqueous battery chemistry. This is not a licensing negotiation — it is a conversation about mutual interest. Ram Krishnan’s operational history in Hong Kong and Karsanbhai’s US-China Business Council access provide executive credibility.
Step 3
Partnership Term Sheet (If Receptive)
Negotiate a joint development agreement or licensing arrangement. CityU gains: a Fortune 500 commercialization partner with global instrumentation reach, access to industrial process development capabilities they do not have, and a royalty stream on the process equipment Emerson sells. Emerson gains: first-mover access to the research group’s unpublished refinements, priority notification of next-generation chemistry developments, and the diplomatic goodwill of a collaborative rather than extractive relationship. China is a massive customer for Emerson across multiple business segments. This relationship has value far beyond one battery chemistry.
Step 4
Regulatory Navigation
IP counsel assesses CFIUS implications (inbound licensing of non-dual-use academic IP — generally permissible), MOFCOM export catalogue applicability (battery electrode preparation technologies were added in 2023–2024, though Hong Kong’s regulatory environment is still partially distinct from the mainland), and any US export control restrictions on instrumentation shipped to a Chinese research partner. These are navigable questions, not deal-breakers.

If the Overture Is Unsuccessful

This section must be stated plainly, because the stakes demand it.

If CityU declines to engage, or if the regulatory environment makes a partnership impractical, Emerson forges ahead with its own scientists and experimental capabilities. The published science provides the roadmap. Emerson’s electrochemists replicate and refine the chemistry independently. The FTO memo identifies any patent claims to design around. The process — purification, monitoring, control, remediation, manufacturing — is entirely Emerson’s own creation regardless.

The Historical Precedent

John Goodenough published the lithium cobalt oxide cathode chemistry in 1980. He did not effectively patent it. Sony commercialized lithium-ion batteries in 1991. Samsung, LG, Panasonic, CATL, and BYD all built competing versions. The entire lithium-ion industry — now worth over $50 billion annually — was built on published science. No single institution controlled the chemistry. The companies that won were the ones that mastered the process: manufacturing at scale, quality control, pack design, and system integration.

Emerson is in the same position now. The chemistry is published. The race is in the process. And Emerson has the only vertically integrated instrumentation stack on Earth — from electrolyte preparation sensors to battery management systems — to run that race.

The Strategic Imperative

The potential of this technology extends beyond Emerson’s commercial interests. Permanent grid-scale energy storage made from abundant, non-toxic, domestically sourced materials is a matter of national infrastructure and, increasingly, national security.

Energy independence. The United States imports the vast majority of its lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements — materials concentrated in a handful of countries, several of which are geopolitical adversaries or unstable partners. An aqueous battery chemistry built from domestic salt, copper, and iron eliminates that dependency entirely. The supply chain runs through New Mexico and North Carolina, not the Atacama Desert and the Congo.

Grid resilience. As climate volatility intensifies — longer heat waves, more severe storms, greater strain on aging infrastructure — the grid needs storage that does not degrade, does not catch fire, and does not require replacement every 5–10 years. A 120,000-cycle battery, if validated at grid rates, is not a product with a lifecycle. It is permanent infrastructure.

Environmental justice. Lithium mining devastates water tables in indigenous communities across South America. Cobalt mining in the DRC relies on child labor. Lithium-ion battery fires in dense urban areas are a growing public safety crisis. An aqueous battery made from food-grade salt and water is not a marginal improvement on these problems. It is a category change.

No nation needs to ask permission to store its own energy.

Competitive reality. The paper is published. Every battery lab on Earth — CATL, BYD, Samsung SDI, national laboratories in China, South Korea, Japan, and Europe — can read it today. The question is not whether someone will industrialize this chemistry. The question is whether it will be an American company with an American supply chain, or whether the United States will once again watch a critical energy technology develop overseas and then spend a decade trying to catch up. China compressed the LFP battery timeline from academic paper to global dominance in under a decade. They will not hesitate on this one.

Emerson’s preferred path is partnership and collaboration with the scientists who made this discovery. That is the right thing to do, and it is the smart thing to do — CityU’s ongoing research may yield refinements that accelerate the timeline, and the relationship opens a channel into the Chinese market that Emerson already values across its existing business segments.

But the potential of this technology — for Emerson, for the grid, for the climate, for the strategic independence of American energy infrastructure — demands that the work proceed with or without that partnership. The chemistry is published. The instruments are in the pantry. Someone will industrialize permanent salt-water energy storage. The only variable is whether Emerson is at the table or watching from the sideline.

The Ask

The Asymmetry

A Stage 0 kill-gate runs first. If Stage 0 disqualifies the science, everything stops at $200K–$400K. The remaining $808K–$1.4M is committed only after Stage 0 produces a written go-decision — and includes the explicit zero-discharge infrastructure (solvent recovery still, electrowinning rig, NaOCl detox loop) and 9 months of metered utilities. Total cost of a negative finding: one consultant’s fee and 12 weeks. Total cost of missing a positive finding: the first-mover window across a product portfolio worth $370M–$1.04B annually at scale. The team above already has the mandates, the relationships, and the technical comprehension. What they need is the signal to move.

PHASE 1 · FULL ENVELOPE
$1.0M – $1.8M
12-month aqueous battery R&D program with explicit zero-discharge commitment. Stage 0 (Months 1–3, $200K–$400K) is a hard kill-gate; Stage 1 (Months 4–12, $808K–$1.4M) is the full lab buildout — equipment + FTEs + recovery infrastructure + 9 months of metered utilities — conditional on Stage 0’s green light.
Stage 0 · Validate
$200K–$400K
Months 1–3 · consult + lab + IP
Stage 1 · Build
$808K–$1.4M
Months 4–12 · lab + equip + FTEs + recovery + utilities

What Phase 1 Looks Like

Stage 1 builds a 2,500 SF working battery laboratory in the northeast corner of the Shakopee Shell Space — three zones organized for workflow, every measurement instrumented with Emerson’s own catalog. The plan exists. The space exists. What is being asked for is permission to occupy it.

Shell Space Phase 1
Shakopee main floor · NE corner · 2,500 SF of 10,000 SF
Zone A · Electrolyte Prep (600 SF)
Zone B · Cell Assembly (800 SF)
Zone C · Testing (1,100 SF)
PHASE 2 / 3 EXPANSION · 7,500 SF AVAILABLE ZONE A Electrolyte Preparation 20' × 30' — 600 SF DeltaV Skid Purification Rosemount 228 / 372 / ELITE ZONE B Cell Assembly & Chemistry 20' × 40' — 800 SF Glovebox Ar / O₂ < 1 ppm Cell assembly Synthesis Bench CuFe-PBA cathode COP anode ZONE C Testing & Characterization 26' × 42' — 1,100 SF NI HPS-17000 150 kW Battery Cycler CC-CV / CP / EIS NaOCl Detox Electrowinning Solvent Recovery Still 480V / 200A POWER RUN cycled cells → Cu recovery loop N
Workflow: feedstock → Zone A purification → Zone B assembly → Zone C cycling & ICP. Power, water, and exhaust enter from the north wall. Load bank discharge feeds Shell Space LEDs — the lab pays its own electric bill from day one.

Where It Goes

Stage 0 (Months 1–3) buys intelligence: can this work? Stage 1 (Months 4–12) buys the working laboratory: does this work in our hands, at grid-relevant rates, with our instruments? Stage 0 must produce a written go-decision before any Stage 1 capital is released.

Stage 0 · Months 1–3 · Hard Kill-Gate
External validation, lab replication, IP scoping, copper remediation feasibility. If Stage 0 returns negative, Phase 1 ends here for <0.001% of the upside.
Line ItemLeanComprehensiveWhat It Buys
Independent Technical Assessment
Senior electrochemistry consultant, 8–12 weeks
Rate: $300–$500/hr (2026 PhD-level battery specialist)
$65,000$130,000Lean: solo expert review. Comprehensive: lead + junior analyst, extended scope including competitive landscape
Laboratory Validation
Cell fabrication, EIS, GITT, high-precision coulometry,
cycling at grid-relevant C-rates, ICP-OES, Raman, water activity
$38,000$80,000Lean: replicate key paper claims at contract lab. Comprehensive: full characterization suite (C-rate sweep, GITT diffusion, Dahn-method coulometry, Raman WIS verification, EQCM mass tracking, copper accumulation). See companion protocol.
COP Synthesis Feasibility
Polymer chemistry assessment, bench-scale trial
Contract manufacturer or university polymer lab
$15,000$35,000Lean: literature review + cost modeling. Comprehensive: gram-scale synthesis trial + characterization (porosity, radical site density, electrochemical performance)
Trade Counsel & IP Navigation
International IP attorney (China/HK specialty)
Rate: $500–$800/hr. CityU tech transfer engagement
$20,000$40,000Lean: MOFCOM/CFIUS analysis + freedom-to-operate memo. Comprehensive: + local HK counsel, CityU tech transfer office engagement, licensing term sheet draft
Travel
MSP→HKG business class ~$5K RT + hotel
Consultant travel, supplier site visits
$12,000$25,000Lean: 1 HK trip + consultant to Shakopee. Comprehensive: 2 HK trips + Nedmag (Netherlands) or Intrepid Potash (Carlsbad, NM) site visit
Copper Remediation Scoping
emew / ElectraMet / Saltworks consultation, bench electrowinning
trial on synthetic MgCl₂ + Cu solution
$5,000$12,000Lean: consultation + feasibility memo. Comprehensive: bench-scale electrowinning trial with recovery rate and purity data
Emerson Instrumentation (Internal)
Rosemount sensors for prototype monitoring loop
Internal transfer pricing
$25,000Comprehensive only: instrument the lab setup with Emerson’s own sensors to validate the product stack thesis in real time
Project Coordination
0.25–0.5 FTE for 12 weeks, external or internal
$15,000$20,000Single point of contact across consultant, lab, counsel, and internal stakeholders
Contingency
15% lean / 10% comprehensive
$30,000$33,000Unplanned travel, extended testing, expedited analysis. Higher lean percentage reflects less-defined scope
Stage 0 Subtotal$200,000$400,000Intelligence vs. intelligence + lab replication

Stage 0 rates reflect 2026 market pricing for specialized battery electrochemistry consulting, international IP law, and contract laboratory services. UK Innovate’s 2025 Battery Innovation Programme benchmarks feasibility studies in the £70K–£500K range for comparable scope.

Stage 1 · Months 4–12 · Conditional Buildout
Releases only after Stage 0 returns a written go-decision. Builds the 2,500 SF Shell Space lab, buys the cycling and characterization equipment, staffs the program, and runs the C-rate, GITT, EIS, ICP, and copper-accumulation campaigns the slides describe.
Line ItemLowerUpperWhat It Buys
Shell Space Buildout
2,500 SF NE-corner lab fit-out: walls, utilities, HVAC,
fume hood, eyewash, fire suppression, 480V/200A power run
$180,000$340,000Three-zone working battery laboratory inside existing Shakopee facility. Lower: lean fit-out reusing existing utilities. Upper: full HVAC + dedicated electrical service.
Equipment · Cycling & Assembly
NI HPS-17000 cycler, NI PXI EIS, inert glovebox,
doctor blade, vacuum oven, electrode press
$200,000$320,000Lower: HPS-17000 + lab-grade glovebox. Upper: + redundant cycler channels + premium glovebox + electrode automation.
Equipment · Characterization
ICP-OES, environmental chamber, water-activity meter,
EQCM, Raman spectrometer access (shared)
$100,000$180,000Lower: ICP + environmental chamber + chargeback to NI Austin for Raman/EQCM. Upper: in-house Raman + EQCM.
Personnel · 9 months
PhD electrochemist (lead), instrument tech, lab tech,
0.5 FTE program manager
$200,000$340,000Lower: 2.5 FTE blended rate, contract + internal. Upper: 4.0 FTE including dedicated PI.
Materials & Consumables
Electrolyte salts, electrode binders, separators,
Ti foil, SS 316L, gases, ICP standards, NaOCl detox reagent
$32,000$65,0009-month operating consumables for ~480 cell builds across YES/NO chemistry sweep, plus NaOCl detox reagent and distillation-still consumables.
Zero-Discharge Capital
Solvent still (rotovap, Zone B) + NaOCl in-line dosing
(Zone A) + electrowinning bench rig (emew/ElectraMet)
+ recovery-loop plumbing & DeltaV integration + LCA scope study
$24,000$48,000Implementation cost of the zero-discharge commitment. Lower: contract LCA + leased electrowinning bench. Upper: in-house LCA + purchased rig + full recovery instrumentation. Phase 2 publishes peer-reviewed LCA.
Energy & Utilities (9 months)
Electricity, compressed air, DI water, fume-hood makeup,
Ar/N₂ cylinders, building HVAC allocation
$10,000$21,000160–240 MWh @ MN industrial rate ($0.07–0.10/kWh) net of load-bank offset (~30–40% of cycling energy returns to Shell Space LEDs). Detailed equipment-by-equipment breakdown in companion protocol.
Stage 1 Contingency
10% on capex, 5% on operating
$32,000$60,000Equipment lead-time delays, expedited shipping, scope additions from Stage 0 findings.
Stage 1 Subtotal$808,000$1,404,000Lab + equipment + 9 months of campaigns + zero-discharge infrastructure + utilities
TOTAL PHASE 1 (Stage 0 + Stage 1)$1.0M$1.8MFull envelope, contingent on Stage 0 go-decision

Stage 1 capex assumes new equipment purchase; if NI / Rosemount / DeltaV units are transferred from existing Shakopee inventory at internal-transfer pricing, the lower bound drops materially. Personnel rates blend Emerson internal labor (loaded) with contract specialists; 9-month duration reflects the post-go-decision build window. Total envelope $1.0M–$1.8M matches the slides commitment and includes the explicit zero-discharge infrastructure (~$24–48K) plus 9 months of metered Energy & Utilities (~$10–21K) inside the same ceiling. Annual run-rate post-build for electricity alone is ~$15–28K/year, partially offset by load-bank discharge feeding Shell Space LEDs and (at Phase 2 scale) building electrical sub-panels.

Shakopee R&D laboratory
R&D laboratory at the Shakopee campus. Instrumentation test benches, environmental chambers, and prototype validation equipment—the infrastructure for a battery pilot already exists on-site. Photo: Emerson / Shakopee

90-Day Assessment Framework

Maps to the Phase 1 budget above. Stages overlap: validation, integration scoping, and first contact run in parallel, not sequence.

Stage 1: Validate the Science (Weeks 1–4)

Commission external electrochemical review. Key questions: capacity retention, rate capability at grid-relevant C-rates (C/10 through 1C), polymer scalability, realistic cell-level energy density. Comprehensive path includes GITT, high-precision coulometry, Raman, and EQCM characterization per the companion experimental protocol. This validates or disqualifies before any organizational resources are committed.

Stage 2: Scope the Integration (Weeks 3–8)

Cross-functional team maps product portfolio alignment. Gap analysis for Ovation Green, Rosemount, NI, and Zitara. Task NI to scope an aqueous cell test package. Task AspenTech to evaluate digital twin feasibility.

Stage 3: First Contact (Weeks 4–12)

Jennie Li and Ram Krishnan initiate outreach to City University of Hong Kong. Simultaneously survey Prevalon data center customers for interest in non-flammable alternatives.

The Close

What This Makes Possible

The horizon beyond Phase 1.
Salt · Water · Power
Beyond Phase 1

The Perpetual Horizon

A battery whose electrolyte is permanent.
Salt and water. Forever.
Edison did not invent electricity. He gave it a filament.
Bell did not invent sound. He gave it a wire.
The chemistry already exists. Who gives it a factory?
Photo: Marwan Abdalah · Unsplash

Phase 1 answers a question. But the answer, if positive, opens a landscape that extends far beyond a single product line.

Phase 2 · Pilot Deployment (Year 1–2)

Self-hosted aqueous battery at Shakopee. DeltaV-controlled electrolyte preparation, NI cell characterization, Ovation Green BESS management. The full Emerson stack operating on Emerson’s own floor. Simultaneously pilot with one cooperative customer and one tofu manufacturer. Validate cycle life, round-trip efficiency, and electrolyte stability at operational scale. If the permanence hypothesis holds, the electrolyte that enters these pilots never needs to be replaced.

Phase 3 · Commercial Products (Year 2–4)

Launch Products 1–6 into commercial channels. Prevalon data center partners receive the first non-flammable BESS offerings. AgriStorage microgrid packages reach Midwest cooperatives. Nedmag and desalination brine recovery supply the electrolyte. Cluj becomes the European engineering hub for measurement instrumentation calibrated to aqueous chemistry. If permanence is confirmed in Phase 1, the electrolyte sourced in Phase 3 becomes permanent infrastructure: no reordering cycle, no degradation replacement, no hazardous recycling.

Phase 4 · Permanent Infrastructure (Year 4+)

Every “renewable” technology carries a hidden extraction treadmill. Solar panels degrade. Wind turbines need rare earth replacements. Lithium batteries lose capacity and require hazardous recycling every 5–10 years.

If Phase 1 validates what the lab has shown, a battery whose electrolyte survives a hundred thousand cycles without consumption or degradation would belong to a different category of infrastructure. The capital expenditure becomes a one-time event, not a recurring line item. Maintenance costs approach zero. Environmental liability disappears. That is the hypothesis. This is the future that Phase 1’s $200K–$400K unlocks the right to test. A platform, not a product line. Permanent energy infrastructure built from salt and water, if the science holds.

THE LONG VIEW

Every energy storage technology deployed at scale today degrades on a schedule. Lithium batteries lose capacity. Lead-acid corrodes. Pumped hydro requires geography. The hidden cost is always replacement. An electrolyte that is not consumed as a reactant would be the first storage medium that does not degrade, deplete, or poison. Its supply is measured in geological epochs. If the science holds, the economics of stationary storage change permanently. The question is whether Emerson builds it.

Appendix: Sources & Citations

Chen, H. et al. (2026). “An aqueous battery using an electrolyte with a pH of 7 and suitable for direct environmental discard.” Nature Communications. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-69384-2
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (2026). “Fertilizer isn’t getting through the Strait of Hormuz.” April 3, 2026.
World Economic Forum (2026). “Beyond oil: 9 commodities impacted by the Strait of Hormuz crisis.” April 1, 2026.
farmdoc daily (2026). “Strait of Hormuz Closure and Fertilizer Supply Risks for U.S. Agriculture.” University of Illinois.
Emerson (2025). “Emerson’s New Battery Energy and Asset Management Software.” June 24, 2025.
Emerson / Zitara (2025). “Emerson and Zitara Partner to Enhance Battery Management Solutions.” February 20, 2025.
Emerson (2023). “Emerson to Acquire Afag and Accelerate Factory Automation Capabilities.” August 17, 2023.
Emerson (2024). “Measurement Solutions for Lithium-Ion Battery Component Manufacturing.” ACHEMA 2024.
Emerson (2024). “Ensure Li-Ion Battery Electrolyte Quality With Improved Conductivity Measurement.” Rosemount 228 application note.
NI / Emerson (2025). “Battery Cell Quality Testing in EV Production.”
NI / Emerson (2024). “Emerson Ventures Invests in EECOMOBILITY.” November 19, 2024.
Emerson (2018). “Emerson Appoints Corporate Leaders for Asia Pacific and China Operations.”
Emerson (2021). “Ram Krishnan named COO; Mark Bulanda to lead Automation Solutions.”
Emerson (2021). “$100 Million Commitment to Venture Capital Initiative.” November 4, 2021.
Emerson Investor Relations. Lal Karsanbhai biography—U.S.-China Business Council board member.
Nasoya / Pulmuone (2026). “Nasoya Expands East Coast Facility.” $55M expansion, 400,000 lbs/day capacity.
Future Market Insights (2025). Global Magnesium Chloride Market—$737.9M (2025), 5.1% CAGR.
ChemAnalyst (2025). Global MgCl₂ production ~1,700 thousand tonnes (2022).
Grand View Research (2023). Magnesium Chloride Market Size report.
Sightline Climate / TechRadar (2026). “Nearly half of US data centers planned for 2026 canceled or delayed.” April 2026. Primary constraint: electrical equipment shortages (transformers, switchgear, batteries).
Automation World (2026). “Emerson Ovation Green Battery Energy Storage System.” January 9, 2026.
FRIENDS of Great Salt Lake. “Mineral Extraction.” 110,000 acres of evaporation ponds; up to 270,000 acre-feet annual water consumption.
FRIENDS of Great Salt Lake. “US Magnesium.” 43,800 acre-feet average annual water depletion 2017–2021.
Fontana, D. et al. (2022). “Magnesium recovery from seawater desalination brines: a technical review.” Environment, Development and Sustainability. Springer Nature.
American Chemical Society. “Magnesium Extraction from Seawater.” History of the Dow process.
USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (2016). “Magnesium Chloride Handling/Processing.” Technical review of sourcing methods and classifications.

Image Credits

Cover (full-bleed background): Dead Sea mineral salts — Petar Milošević, Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0
Exec Summary: Lithium battery hazmat staging area, Emerson Shakopee — Connor Scanlan
The Science (chapter hero): Lithium-ion coin cells under red safety lighting — Chingo K, Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0
The Science: Aqueous vs lithium-ion comparison — original infographic
Product Stack: NI NHR-9300 battery test system — NI / Emerson, used with permission
Product Stack: Grid-scale BESS installation — Reid Gardner, Moapa, NV, Wikimedia Commons CC0
New Products (full-bleed hero): Reverse osmosis desalination plant — James Grellier, Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 3.0
Self-Hosted Pilot: Shakopee headquarters — McGough Construction, used with permission
Market Opportunity (full-bleed hero): Google data center, Council Bluffs, Iowa — Google / Connie Zhou (press photo)
Market Opportunity: Riceland Foods Cooperative — USDA Agricultural Research Service (K7577-4), Public Domain
Supply Chain: Great Salt Lake mineral evaporation ponds — Mary Anne Karren / EcoFlight, used with permission
Supply Chain: Merkers salt mine, Thuringia — A.Savin, Free Art License
Supply Chain: Intrepid Potash Carlsbad West Mine — USGS Open-File Report 2016-1167, Public Domain
Midwest Corridor (full-bleed hero): Meta Rosemount data center campus, Dakota County MN — Meta Platforms, Inc.
Midwest Corridor: Soybean field and wind farm, Minonk Township IL — Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0
Perpetual Horizon (full-bleed hero): Pacific Ocean sunset, Rancho Palos Verdes — Marwan Abdalah, Unsplash License
Coda (full-bleed closing): Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia — Erciq, Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0
The Champions: Victoria Harbour at dusk — Joybot, Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 2.0
Diagrams (competitive coverage grid) are original graphics. Cell architecture and value chain are rendered as native HTML.

Want this as a printable PDF?  Request a copy →